Spinal Pedicle-Screw Fixation

Biomechanics

  • Increased strength with:
    • Fit & fill of screw in isthmus of pedicle with increased screw diameter correlating favourably with pullout strength
    • Converging screws

Spinal Pedicle Screw Fixation 1

  • Patients with multiple spontaneous compression fractures are poor candidates for pedicle-screw based internal fixation because of poor bone-mineral density
  • Body weight is a major determinant affecting structural survival of rods used for scoliosis correction

 

Technique of Safe Insertion (Funnel technique)

  • Dorsal projection of pedicle localized
  • 1cm-diameter section of cortical bone removed over top of pedicle with a burr or rongeur
  • Cancellous bone within pedicle visualized & removed with curette until pedicle cortical wall felt & visualised, followed by going deeper into pedicle toward isthmus
  • Kerrison rongeur used to remove cortical bone peripherally so that isthmus of pedicle can be seen
  • Once isthmus of the pedicle is directly palpated, a small (2mm) pedicle probe is passed through isthmus into vertebral body
  • Larger (5mm) probe then used to enlarge path through isthmus of pedicle
  • Small pins placed into probed pedicles as radiographic markers
  • AP & lateral images confirm pedicle path & length of screw to be used (depth of each pin measured after removal)
  • Threads cut into pedicle with progressively larger taps until firm cortical purchase achieved to determine screw diameter
  • Ball-tip probe used to feel pedicle wall viability in all directions
  • Screw inserted into pedicle
  • AP & lateral images confirm proper positioning after all of screws, rods, & connectors are inserted

 Supplemental Fixation

  • Polymethymethacrylate may be utilised to improve fixation, esp in osteoporotic bone
  • Bicortical purchase routinely utilised at 1st sacral level but not at any other level

 Assessment of Fusion

  • Radiographic demonstration of trabeculation across intertransverse (lateral) or interbody area to determine presence or absence of solid union of a spinal fusion

 Union Rate

  • 90 to 95% with pedicle-screw-based posterolateral fusion alone, without cages, using only autograft obtained from laminectomy

Complications

  • Nerve-root &/or cauda equina injury (5%)
  • Dural penetration (4%)
  • Deep infection (2%)
    • Prompt wound debridement & administration of antibiotics, with preservation of implant & subsequent delayed primary closure
  • Screw breakage (5%)
  • Screw pull-out & screw-connector disengagement
  • Implant-related pain

 Indications

  • Scoliosis
  • Spondylolisthesis:
    • Vertebrectomy at 5th lumbar level with reduction of 4th lumbar onto 1st sacral vertebra with use of single-level instrumentation & fusion may be used for spondyloptosis
  • Spinal fracture:
    • 1 vertebra cephalad to the damaged vertebra to 1 vertebra caudal to it
  • Lumbar degenerative disc disease
  • Spinal osteotomy
  • Spina bifida
  • Neoplasms:
    • Post-total vertebrectomy or radical resection
  • Lesions of cervical spine & cervicothoracic junction:
    • Traumatic & developmental lesions
  • Spinopelvic trauma:
    • Traumatic spinopelvic disruption & vertical fractures of sacrum